Cemented tibial stems are not requisite in revision.

نویسنده

  • Kenneth A Gustke
چکیده

Tibial stems are necessary in most total knee revisions to share the load and protect the fixation interface of the tibial tray. Successful use of a tibial stem requires independent stability of the stem with or without cement. Some additional geometry on the undersurface of the tibial tray such as peripheral pegs or fins is necessary to provide additional resistance to rotatory stresses if the stem is not cemented. Cementing the tibial stem works. However, with the excellent results of cementless stems, who would want to deal with cement removal in those few cases of loosening or the occasional case with infection or instability? The disadvantages of a press-fit stem are not seen with modem tibial stems, such as with a long conical stem with an offset attachment to the tibial baseplate as used in this series. Cement is not necessary!

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Cemented stems are requisite in revision knee replacement.

Obtaining rigid prosthesis fixation in bone loss can be a significant challenge during revision total knee replacement (TKR).1 Stemmed prosthetic components off load stresses at the damaged metaphyseal interfaces, bypass bone defects, and provide additional prosthetic surface area for fixation.1-4 Relatively little longterm data exists documenting the durability of stemmed revision TKR and cont...

متن کامل

Clinical & radiographic outcomes of cemented vs. diaphyseal engaging cementless stems in aseptic revision TKA.

Modular revision systems have become standard in revision TKAs. However, the type of stem fixation remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of failure between cemented and diaphyseal engaging cementless stems in aseptic revision TKAs. We performed a multicenter retrospective review of 82 revision TKAs performed for aseptic failure. Follow-up averaged 76 and 1...

متن کامل

Tibial Component in Revision of Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison between Cemented and Hybrid Fixation

OBJECTIVE To compare the clinical, radiographic and medium-term follow-up results from two fixation methods for the tibial component in revision procedures on total knee prostheses: cemented (tray and stem) and hybrid (cemented tray and uncemented, nonporous canal-filling stem). METHODS Between August 1999 and November 2005, 30 revision procedures on total knee arthroplasties were performed o...

متن کامل

Pain at the end of the stem after revision total knee arthroplasty.

A consecutive series of patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty was studied prospectively. Clinical and radiographic assessment was performed preoperatively, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. Evaluation consisted of a Knee Society clinical score and assessment of patient satisfaction. In addition, patients completed drawings of their lower extremity regardin...

متن کامل

Revision TKA with a condylar constrained prosthesis using metaphyseal and surface cementation: a minimum 6-year follow-up analysis

BACKGROUND The increasing number of revision knee arthroplasty result in the more frequently use of a constraint implant but results from previous reports are difficult to interpret. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of superficial cemented versus metaphyseal cemented in revision total knee arthroplasty with a condylar constrained arthroplasty. METHODS The study ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Orthopedics

دوره 27 9  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004